zipradar

Compare · WA · OR

ZIP 98101 vs ZIP 97201

Seattle, WA compared to Portland, OR on twelve public-records dimensions sourced from EPA, FEMA, USDA, FBI, NCES, and county records. Each cell links to the per-ZIP topic page where the source citation and refresh cadence live.

Last verified 2026-09-24 · methodology

ZIP 98101

Seattle, WA

Washington

Full dashboard →

ZIP 97201

Portland, OR

Oregon

Full dashboard →

Verdict

On the 3 of 12 dimensions that carry measured values today, radon differs — 98101 is Zone 3, 97201 is Zone 2 (lower is less predicted potential); 2025 median air quality is Good in both (AQI 43 vs 37); neither water system reports a health-based violation in 3 years. zipradar names no overall winner: the other 9 dimensions are not populated yet, and these three are county-level indicators rather than address-level readings. Open either ZIP below for the source and refresh date behind each number.

Side by side

Dimensions populate live as ingestion reaches each source. Every row will link to the primary regulator.

Washington context

Wildfire (eastern), Cascadia seismic, coastal flood

Washington's wildfire risk concentrates in eastern WA + the Cascades. Cascadia subduction zone shapes long-term seismic risk. Puget Sound coastal flood zones face Risk Rating 2.0 pressure. Seattle has documented LCRR lead-service-line obligations.

Washington state page →

Oregon context

Wildfire, Cascadia seismic, coastal flood

Oregon has high WUI wildfire risk in the Cascades + eastern + southern forests. Cascadia subduction zone shapes long-term seismic risk. Coastal FEMA VE/AE zones; Portland metro carries some LCRR obligations.

Oregon state page →

Read more on cross-ZIP comparisons

Editorial deep-dives that help when reading two places side-by-side — what each data layer actually proves, and what it doesn't.

More comparisons